NY Today News
NY Today News: Your Daily Dose of Local and Global Headlines

Starmer to meet Macron in Paris as thinktank says Labour’s proposed Brexit renegotiation might not be worth it – UK politics live

Starmer to meet Macron in Paris as thinktank says Labour’s proposed Brexit renegotiation might not be worth it

Good morning. Keir Starmer is in Paris today for a meeting with the French president, Emmanuel Macron. The Labour leader is already ahead of Rishi Sunak on who would make the best PM according to most polls (it depends exactly who you ask the question), but if you want to look prime ministerial, there is no substitute for doing the sort of things that a prime minister does. We are not expecting to get TV footage of the meeting, because there are protocol issues that kick in when a head of state is just meeting an opposition leader. But, coming after his recent trip to The Hague and to the Global Progress Action conference in Canada, Starmer’s latest outing on the world stage should provide a helpful boost to his political authority.

Starmer posted this picture on X (formerly Twitter) yesterday.

But will Starmer make any progress on substance? One topic that is bound to come up is Starmer’s suggestion, in a Financial Times interview published yesterday, that he would negotiate a “much better” Brexit deal with the EU. In an analysis, Kiran Stacey, Lisa O’Carroll and Pippa Crerar suggest that Labour is “unlikely to find a receptive audience in European capitals for such a renegotiation unless the party is willing to offer significant concessions”.

Today UK in a Changing Europe, which is probably the leading British thinktank on Brexit issues, has published a report on how the Brexit deal might be renegotiated, and it says achieving the sort of renegotiation that Labour wants could take years and might not be worth it. It says:

Assuming Labour’s position holds, it will need to persuade the EU to undertake an expansive TCA [trade and cooperation agreement] review. Its current proposals focus on UK priorities (trade easements), and it would have to refine its offer to address key EU interests, which are likely to lie in improving mobility arrangements for young people and enhanced cooperation on security and defence.

The kinds of agreements Labour is seeking often entail long, technical negotiations which can take years to conclude. They would demand significant administrative resources at a time when the party would have many other priorities. There could also be political costs to signing up to agreements which require continuous, ongoing alignment with EU regulations over which the UK will have no say. The EU would also have to trust that future UK governments, which could be far more Eeurosceptic, will uphold such agreements.

While these kinds of agreements would have clear benefits for certain sectors, they would not address the bulk of the overall economic cost of Brexit for the UK, as it would remain outside the single market and customs union. Labour would have to think carefully about whether the benefits of a maximalist TCA review justify the administrative and political capital it would have to expend.

Here is the agenda for the day.

9.30am: Rishi Sunak chairs cabinet.

10am: Lady Barran, an education minister, and Susan Acland-Hood, permanent secretary at Department for Education, give evidence to the Commons education committee about Raac (reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete) in schools.

10am: The Scottish government begins a legal challenge at the court of session in Edinburgh against the UK government’s decision to block its gender recognition reform bill.

11am (UK time): Keir Starmer meets the French president, Emmanuel Macron, at the Élysée Palace in Paris.

11.15am: Chris Heaton-Harris, the Northern Ireland secretary, gives evidence to the Lords protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland sub committee about the Windsor framework.

11.30am: Downing Street holds a lobby briefing.

11.30am: Claire Coutinho, the new energy secretary, takes questions in the Commons for the first time.

2.15pm: Kemi Badenoch, the business and trade secretary, gives evidence to the Commons business and trade committee.

Also, hospital consultants in England are on strike.

If you want to contact me, do try the “send us a message” feature. You’ll see it just below the byline – on the left of the screen, if you are reading on a laptop or a desktop. This is for people who want to message me directly. I find it very useful when people message to point out errors (even typos – no mistake is too small to correct). Often I find your questions very interesting, too. I can’t promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either in the comments below the line, privately (if you leave an email address and that seems more appropriate), or in the main blog, if I think it is a topic of wide interest.

Key events

Steve Barclay, the health secretary, arriving in Downing Street for cabinet this morning. Photograph: Stefan Rousseau/PA

DfE publishes updated list of schools affecrted by Raac

The Department for Education has published its updated list of schools in England affected by Raac (reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete). As more school building surveys have been completed, the number of schools affected has risen from 147 to 174.

Keir Starmer (centre), Rachel Reeves, the shadow chancellor, and David Lammy, the shadow foreign secretary, in Paris this morning ahead of their meeting with President Macron.
Keir Starmer (centre), Rachel Reeves, the shadow chancellor, and David Lammy, the shadow foreign secretary, in Paris this morning ahead of their meeting with President Macron.
Photograph: Kiran Ridley/Getty Images

Steve Barclay accuses NHS staff of planning ‘politically timed’ strikes

Steve Barclay, the health secretary, has accused NHS staff in England of planning “politically timed” industrial action as he outlined proposals to extend strike laws to ensure doctors and nurses in hospitals provide a minimum level of cover, Ben Quinn reports.

Starmer to meet Macron in Paris as thinktank says Labour’s proposed Brexit renegotiation might not be worth it

Good morning. Keir Starmer is in Paris today for a meeting with the French president, Emmanuel Macron. The Labour leader is already ahead of Rishi Sunak on who would make the best PM according to most polls (it depends exactly who you ask the question), but if you want to look prime ministerial, there is no substitute for doing the sort of things that a prime minister does. We are not expecting to get TV footage of the meeting, because there are protocol issues that kick in when a head of state is just meeting an opposition leader. But, coming after his recent trip to The Hague and to the Global Progress Action conference in Canada, Starmer’s latest outing on the world stage should provide a helpful boost to his political authority.

Starmer posted this picture on X (formerly Twitter) yesterday.

But will Starmer make any progress on substance? One topic that is bound to come up is Starmer’s suggestion, in a Financial Times interview published yesterday, that he would negotiate a “much better” Brexit deal with the EU. In an analysis, Kiran Stacey, Lisa O’Carroll and Pippa Crerar suggest that Labour is “unlikely to find a receptive audience in European capitals for such a renegotiation unless the party is willing to offer significant concessions”.

Today UK in a Changing Europe, which is probably the leading British thinktank on Brexit issues, has published a report on how the Brexit deal might be renegotiated, and it says achieving the sort of renegotiation that Labour wants could take years and might not be worth it. It says:

Assuming Labour’s position holds, it will need to persuade the EU to undertake an expansive TCA [trade and cooperation agreement] review. Its current proposals focus on UK priorities (trade easements), and it would have to refine its offer to address key EU interests, which are likely to lie in improving mobility arrangements for young people and enhanced cooperation on security and defence.

The kinds of agreements Labour is seeking often entail long, technical negotiations which can take years to conclude. They would demand significant administrative resources at a time when the party would have many other priorities. There could also be political costs to signing up to agreements which require continuous, ongoing alignment with EU regulations over which the UK will have no say. The EU would also have to trust that future UK governments, which could be far more Eeurosceptic, will uphold such agreements.

While these kinds of agreements would have clear benefits for certain sectors, they would not address the bulk of the overall economic cost of Brexit for the UK, as it would remain outside the single market and customs union. Labour would have to think carefully about whether the benefits of a maximalist TCA review justify the administrative and political capital it would have to expend.

Here is the agenda for the day.

9.30am: Rishi Sunak chairs cabinet.

10am: Lady Barran, an education minister, and Susan Acland-Hood, permanent secretary at Department for Education, give evidence to the Commons education committee about Raac (reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete) in schools.

10am: The Scottish government begins a legal challenge at the court of session in Edinburgh against the UK government’s decision to block its gender recognition reform bill.

11am (UK time): Keir Starmer meets the French president, Emmanuel Macron, at the Élysée Palace in Paris.

11.15am: Chris Heaton-Harris, the Northern Ireland secretary, gives evidence to the Lords protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland sub committee about the Windsor framework.

11.30am: Downing Street holds a lobby briefing.

11.30am: Claire Coutinho, the new energy secretary, takes questions in the Commons for the first time.

2.15pm: Kemi Badenoch, the business and trade secretary, gives evidence to the Commons business and trade committee.

Also, hospital consultants in England are on strike.

If you want to contact me, do try the “send us a message” feature. You’ll see it just below the byline – on the left of the screen, if you are reading on a laptop or a desktop. This is for people who want to message me directly. I find it very useful when people message to point out errors (even typos – no mistake is too small to correct). Often I find your questions very interesting, too. I can’t promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either in the comments below the line, privately (if you leave an email address and that seems more appropriate), or in the main blog, if I think it is a topic of wide interest.



News Source